Precisión de las impresiones digitales utilizando tecnología TRIOS vs impresión analógica con siliconas de adición en Rehabilitación bucal. Revisión Sistemática

Abstract

The success of rehabilitative treatment depends on a fundamental process, impressions, which, with technological advancements, aim to replace conventional methods. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of digital impressions using TRIOS (intraoral scanner brand) technology with analog impressions using additional silicones in oral rehabilitation. The research followed the PRISMA methodology and the PICO strategy, selecting recent articles published between 2019 and 2024 in Scopus, PubMed, and Redalyc databases.

The results reveal that digital impressions with TRIOS offer superior accuracy, with an average of 30 µm, compared to analog impressions, with an average of 47.67 µm. This difference suggests that digital technology provides greater precision, reducing the risk of clinical complications; however, it entails high investment costs and a prolonged learning curve.

The review concludes that both techniques have effective clinical applications, but digital impressions may offer better results in cases that require greater accuracy.

Keywords: Accuracy, digital impression, conventional impression, oral rehabilitation