Unidad Académica de Ciencias Sociales
URI permanente para esta comunidadhttps://dspace.ucacue.edu.ec/handle/ucacue/6
Examinar
Examinando Unidad Académica de Ciencias Sociales por Asesores "Hidalgo Palacios, José Felipe"
Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
- Resultados por página
- Opciones de ordenación
Ítem Acceso Abierto La efectividad de la reparación integral a la víctima en delitos sexuales en el sistema procesal de Ecuador(Universidad Católica de Cuenca., 2024) Rea Ávila , Freddy Xavier; Hidalgo Palacios, José Felipe; 0104827555This research analyzes the concept of comprehensive reparation for victims of sexual crimes within the context of the Ecuadorian criminal process. The aim is to achieve an integrated response that protects the victim’s rights as a subject of the process and its recognition through the preparatory phase, employing a penalty as a practical response that comprehensively protects their rights and needs. Comprehensive reparation for the victim has proven ineffective within the legal system because, in most cases, it is not fully implemented, and, in many instances, the victim is again subjected to the violation of constitutional rights. Therefore, the State must implement public policies and programs that ensure comprehensive reparation in all its forms, considering that the rights violated in sexual crimes are complex to compensate.Ítem Acceso Abierto Vulneración del principio de inocencia a través del uso excesivo de la prisión preventiva en delitos flagrantes(Universidad Católica de Cuenca., 2024) Cedillo Yánez, Bryan Adrián; Hidalgo Palacios, José Felipe; 0704394840The presumption of innocence, a fundamental pillar of human rights, ensures that every person is considered innocent until proven guilty through a fair judicial process. However, the excessive use of pre-trial detention, especially in cases of flagrant offenses, significantly undermines this principle. In such cases, the immediate detention of suspects often leads to a presumption of guilt, turning pre-trial detention into a de facto punishment rather than a precautionary measure. This study analyzes the disproportionate application of pre-trial detention in flagrant offenses, highlighting its deviation from the principles of legality, necessity, and proportionality. This practice not only violates fundamental rights but also generates severe social and personal consequences, such as stigmatization, loss of employment, and prison overcrowding. The analysis incorporates international human rights standards, particularly the Inter-American Court of Human Rights jurisprudence, which emphasizes that pre-trial detention should be maintained as an exceptional measure. The research underscores the need for legislative reforms, judicial training, and the adoption of non-custodial alternative measures to ensure the effective protection of the presumption of innocence and achieve a balance between justice and individual rights.
